NFLStats2026 · Wk 2

Week 1 · Final · Melbourne Cricket Ground (dome)

Model

75%SF25%LA

Projected SF 27.1 – LA 18.1
margin −9.0 · total 45.2

Market

34%SF66%LA

LA -3.5 · O/U 47.5
implied SF 22.0 – LA 25.5

Edge

Model minus market. Small numbers are noise; a few points is a real disagreement.

Spread edge
−12.5
SF side of the number
Total edge
−2.3
leans under

Side by side

Season to date with league ranks.

SFLA
+5.2 3rdPower rating30th −5.2
+2.2 7thOffense rating29th −3.0
+3.0 4thDefense rating26th −2.2
+0.190 7thOffense EPA/play27th −0.226
−0.226 4thDefense EPA/play allowed24th +0.190
56.9% 3rdOffense success rate16th 43.3%
43.3% 15thDefense success rate allowed28th 56.9%
+0.227 11thPass EPA/dropback28th −0.270
−0.270 3rdPass EPA/dropback allowed20th +0.227
+0.142 2ndRush EPA/carry23rd −0.171
−0.171 8thRush EPA/carry allowed29th +0.142
7.7% 18thExplosive play rate20th 6.7%
6.7% 11thExplosive rate allowed12th 7.7%
58.3% 4th3rd-down conversion25th 22.2%
22.2% 6th3rd-down conversion allowed27th 58.3%
66.7% 15thRed-zone TD rate24th 33.3%
33.3% 4thRed-zone TD rate allowed12th 66.7%
5.6% 3rdPressure rate allowed28th 27.6%
27.6% 3rdPressure rate28th 5.6%
11.1% 15thTurnover rate25th 20.0%
20.0% 5thTakeaway rate16th 11.1%
27.0 12thPoints per game30th 7.0
7.0 3rdPoints allowed per game19th 27.0
+5.1% Pass rate over expected −14.8%
32.7 24thNeutral pace (sec/play)22nd 31.8
+0.190 Off epa last3 −0.226
−0.226 Def epa last3 +0.190
−0.7 25thSpecial teams EPA20th +0.1

SF offense vs LA defense

Offense percentiles for SF against the matching defensive percentiles for LA. Where the offense polygon reaches beyond the defense, the attack has the edge.

PassRushSuccessExplosive3rd downRed zoneProtectionBall security
SFLA D

LA offense vs SF defense

Offense percentiles for LA against the matching defensive percentiles for SF. Where the offense polygon reaches beyond the defense, the attack has the edge.

PassRushSuccessExplosive3rd downRed zoneProtectionBall security
LASF D